Open main menu

Bulbapedia β

User talk:Pikablu

Welcome to Bulbapedia, Pikablu!
Bulbapedia bulb.png

By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:

  • Be nice to everyone. It's in the code of conduct.
  • Make good edits. Preview them before you save to make sure they're perfect the first time around.
  • Use wikicode and link templates when adding content to a page.
  • Use proper grammar and spelling, and read the manual of style.
  • You can't create a userpage until you've added to the encyclopedia. It's a privilege. See the userspace policy.
  • Use talk pages to resolve editing disputes. Don't "edit war," or constantly re-edit/undo the same thing on a page.
  • If you have a question about something, be proactive. Take a look at our FAQ. If you're still stuck, ask for help. The staff won't bite.
  • Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~). This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment.
  • For more handy links, see the welcome portal.
Thank you, and have a good time editing here!
  リックEO (メッセージ) 11:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)  
 

Pachirisu's Gender

Hello, just to let you know, Pachirisu's gender is not confirmed unless stated in the show. Just because it has the male variant stripe, doesn't mean it is a male for the following reasons: 1)a female variant hasn't appeared in the anime 2)its gender difference is rather difficult to point out since it has to do with the length of a stripe and the animator may (unintentionally) make errors regarding its length (like making it too long for one scene and too short the next). Thank you.--ForceFire 03:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Chespin trivia

The Chespin trivia refers to the species as a whole, not specifically Clemont's Chespin. Pachirisu is different, since it is referring specifically to Dawn's Pachirisu being the first Electric type to be caught by another main character.--ForceFire 14:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

And this trivia is specifically referring to Clemont's Chespin being the first regional grass starter to not be caught by Ash. It is the same thing.- unsigned comment from Pikablu (talkcontribs)
Please indent your comments with a colon and don't forget to sign. You may not sign after an unsigned template has been issued as it wil give off the wrong timestamp.--ForceFire 16:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
First of all....Chespin as a species was not caught by Ash, the page you are telling is Clemont's Chespin. In Dawn's Case, Pachirisu, it was the first electeic type to be owned other than Ash. What you are trying is to be added on Chespin (Pokémon) Page.... these things are different Pratik_12 Talk 16:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
No what I am trying to add is that Clemont's Chespin is the first owned by a main character to not be owned by Ash, on Clemont's Chespin's page.Pikablu (talk) 16:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
You cannot understand what they are saying. You didn't specify your trivia to Clemont's Chespin, you specified it to the Chespin species. Your trivia is right, it is just not placed to the right page. Poké95 01:06, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Okay so where should it go then?Pikablu (talk) 02:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

What you added was Chespin is the first regional Grass type starter Pokémon not to be owned by Ash. What you are saying is Clemont's Chespin is the first regional Grass type starter Pokémon not to be owned by Ash. See the difference? one refers to the whole species whilst the other only refers to Clemont's Chespin specifically. What you should've done was a slight rewording rather than copying and pasting.--ForceFire 05:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

So the reworded one can be added?Pikablu (talk) 05:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes. Try to reword it similarly to how Dawn's Pachrisu's trivia is worded.--ForceFire 06:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm glad you're my number one fan!

But seriously though, if you have a problem with a staff member either talk to the staff member or keep it to yourself. You shouldn't exclude someone just because you don't like them. Thank you.--ForceFire 14:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

I was not trying to exclude you or start a problem. I was just stating off of what I saw that if you want something done around here, keep it away from you. I would say 80% of what you do is undo edits, and maybe half of them deserved it.--Pikablu (talk) 14:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
I apologize if this comes out rude.--Pikablu (talk) 14:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
And why should they keep it away from me? I get the feeling you're still mad about me undoing your trivia, get over it, what's done is done. I don't just undo edits for no reasons, y'know, I actually look at them and judge whether they're necessary changes.--ForceFire 14:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
No I am not still upset about that. I am upset about you deciding to shoot down every idea that comes up, which is why I said not to ask you. Progress is undone when you get involved.--Pikablu (talk) 14:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
And apart from your suggestions, what would that be?--ForceFire 14:46, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Here are a few.
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=XY088&diff=prev&oldid=2337001
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=BW018&diff=prev&oldid=2335883
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Flying_(type)&diff=prev&oldid=2333939
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=XY076&diff=prev&oldid=2329540
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Dawn%27s_Piplup&diff=prev&oldid=2326383
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Ash%27s_Pidgeot&diff=prev&oldid=2323542
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=XY022&diff=prev&oldid=2316241
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=XY081&diff=prev&oldid=2311769
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Iris%27s_Dragonite&diff=prev&oldid=2306406--Pikablu (talk) 15:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


1) As I said in the edit summary, single frame errors aren't notable. It goes by quickly that no one is going to notice it or care.
2) Again, read the edit summary, what it contained is not relevant to the trivia.
3) That can be seen by looking at the template above the trivia section. Anything that can be seen by looking through the page isn't really notable.
4) Again, Read the summary. Anything that happens the second time isn't notable, unless there's a considerable drought between the two.
5) Again read the edit summary. I mentioned that dodging a move isn't an improvisation. It's just dodging a move.
6) That's an edit you've made that I reverted. I've already told you why I reverted that (and it shows you're not over it). But just to repeat, unnecessary paragraphing and the Other appearances section header is to be remained unchanged, it did not appear in BW (openings/endings do not count).
7) Read Yash Sen's talk page or one of the sections on my talk page archive. Don't say an edit does not deserve it if you don't understand the context of the reversion.
8) Read the edit summary. Normal types being immune to ghost types have not been confirmed in the anime, anime=/=games.
9) Read the edit summary (of which you got the wrong reversion). It was too specific the first time (singling out Ash). Rahl's version was better (which I evidently decided not to revert).
I noticed that for all of these, you seemingly didn't read the edit summaries. Please read the edit summary for they will explain the reasons for the reversions, that's what an edit summary is for. Also, for the Yash Sen example, you do not know the context of that reversion so you have no right in saying that that wasn't necessary. If you don't understand the context of a reversion, then just leave it.--ForceFire 15:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Pokémon Nicknames

Please stop making edits like these. This is how the site has always listed names for Pokémon with nicknames. Changes like this must be discussed. If you change them again without discussing, this will be brought to an admin. --HoennMaster 04:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

The "nick" parameter should only have the nickname of the Pokémon since that's what it's for. As for evolutions, it doesn't need to pre-evo parameter since, yes it evolved, but its name is the same.--ForceFire 05:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
I only put those there so you could actually tell what form it was in and wether it was evolved or not. I've always looked at them and got confused about if it had evolved. Where can I bring up how this might actually be a good idea? Sorry for trying to fix an eyesore.--Pikablu (talk) 05:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
That's why there's images in the template.--ForceFire 06:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
And what if there isn't? Or what about when there are 3 forms to the evolution like Red's Venusaur. It's impossible to clarify based off of what is there right now.--Pikablu (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Trivia of page Ash Ketchum

Hey, I removed that point because it is false.Ash did won Trio badge in the same episode as he met the striation city gym leaders. See BW005. - unsigned comment from Pokemon master sachin (talkcontribs)

Ash begins his battle with Cilan in BW005 but does not finish the battle and win the Trio Badge until halfway through the next episode, BW006. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Pokemon template colors

Hi! I'd just like to make sure you know that templates for Pokemon should use their base types, not (like this) their types when Mega Evolved. Try to keep it in mind in the future. Thanks! Tiddlywinks (talk) 02:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Regarding normal types immune to ghost types

I read above that according to you it is not proved in anime that normal types are immune to ghost type moves. But it has been hinted many times in DP series. In battle Zoey used glameow's shadow claw against Dawn's normal types which Dawn responded by saying that normal types are ghost type moves. - unsigned comment from Pokemon master sachin (talkcontribs)

Manga moves.

Please be sure that when editing articles related to certain Pokemon manga you do not add a move unless it is explicitly called out by someone. Moves are rarely consistent between uses in Pokespe and it is much preferred that we do not assume, even if the move seems obvious. Ataro (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

but isn't it obvious with these ones? Keldeo uses hydro pump the same way in the movies and the other three were talking about using sacred sword.--Pikablu (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Whether or not something is "obvious" is entirely subjective. It could just as well be Aqua Jet or Water Gun. And this isn't the movies, it's Pokespe, a completely different continuity made by completely different people. And while I admit that everything about Keldeo and the Swords of Justice is clearly meant to be a reference to the Keldeo movie, I'd much rather get explicit confirmation. Also, did they say "Sacred Sword" out loud? Unless they did, it could be anything. Ataro (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Again, I'd like to remind you not to do this. Nowhere were any of the Swords of Justice explicitly stated to have use Sacred Sword in those chapters. Those swords they used could be any kind of sword move. Ataro (talk) 01:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
And once again, you ignored my request. Please, do not do this again, or I will be forced to take action. Ataro (talk) 22:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
but you can see it be used.--Pikablu (talk) 23:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Not acceptable. The original message in this discussion clearly explains why that doesn't work. So read it, please. Ataro (talk) 01:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Message

I do not know what your problem with me is, but please cut it out, especially since it's effecting the site. So please change your edit on Alain's Charizard's page back now, as it is completely unnecessary and it shouldn't be there. Playerking95 (talk) 06:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

It was adding a link. I have no issue with you and don't see why you think that. Sorry to irate you about it though.Pikablu (talk) 16:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
I'm not buying it. Because why else would you vandalize Officer Jenny's Gumshoos page by adding wrong information? Please stop doing this, or an admin might tell you off. Playerking95 (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm not vandalizing. I'm adding the moves it used. You need to stop removing everything just because it's not your presious way doesn't make it wrong. No one else has a problem but you so please stop lowering the quality of this site.--Pikablu (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
A couple of things, you are vandalizing it because Officer Jenny's Gumshoos is not the Totem one and only the Totem one used Frustration and Rock Tomb. And doing the right thing =/= lowering the quality of this site. Also, people would agree with me, but they're probably to busy off doing something else to notice. Someone probably made a mistake by confusing the two Gumshoos and then others just went with that. So please undo your most recent edit to the page before someone else does. Playerking95 (talk) 17:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Okay, you're really not fooling anyone at this point. I've already contacted an admin about this, so you're going to have to stop doing this. Playerking95 (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
What are you talking about?--Pikablu (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Are you talking about my Rock Throw edit? That's where it is supposed to link to I'm not trying to attack you.--Pikablu (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Please, stop this, it's obvious as hell. I've seen you undo my edits after I've already corrected things, multiple times. If it was once, it wouldn't matter, two, maybe a coincidence, but more then four-five times, that's a pattern. And no, that's not where it should link to. The Rockruff in the manga is Professor Kukui's the one in the anime is Ash's. Just because Professor Kukui once befriended the one in the anime, it doesn't mean that any link should link to Ash's. They are not the same Pokemon and they do not have the same trainer and never did have any other trainer, as far as we're aware. Playerking95 (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
But that is where it links to. Have you seen the page? It links to that Rockruff. It's similar to Nolands Articuno or Sabrina's Haunter. It's considered "theirs" on some level even if they don't technically "own" it.--Pikablu (talk) 14:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Code of conduct

Personal attacks like "You just want to feel important by stopping it" are never called for. Please make sure you are familiar with our code of conduct.

Thank you. Tiddlywinks (talk) 15:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry. It got a little heated. I'll do better.--Pikablu (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Chapter pages.

Please, do not make articles for the individual Pokemon Adventures until a volume comes out. Pokemon Adventures' release schedule is incredibly complicated. As such, it has been decided that articles should be made only when an official source collects them in a volume. Ataro (talk) 22:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Oh okay. But the B2W2 chap does it when they come out.--Pikablu (talk) 03:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Not the same thing. SM is an entirely new story. B2W2 is just continuing from where volume 52 ended. Also, the official website explictely refers to the new B2W2 chapters as chapter 532 and up. Ataro (talk) 14:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Blocked.

Because you chose to repeatedly ignore my warning about not adding manga moves unless they are explicitly called out, you have been blocked. I have requested multiple times that a move should only be added unless someone outright states the name of the move, but you continue to add them to pages or change articles to claim they were used earlier than they were. Do not do this again, or you will be blocked for longer periods of time. Ataro (talk) 05:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Anime moves

Hi! I just wanted to make sure our policy on adding moves for the anime is clear. It is our current policy that, as a rule, moves should not be assumed unless they were called or else explicitly identified after the fact. The only possible exceptions are, tentatively, the moves on this list.

So even if you think a move looks the same as another example of Bite that can be reliabily identified, it's not okay to assume it is the same move. And while I know Hyper Beam is currently on the list I mentioned above, I think for the time being it would be best to discuss this case.

I hope you can keep this in mind in the future. Thanks! Tiddlywinks (talk) 16:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Re: all this... Please remember the above. As far as I'm concerned, the next time you forget this, you will be courting a block. Tiddlywinks (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Edits

I'm sorry if you're frustrated and it feels like I'm "undoing all your edits", but I'm merely patrolling my watchlist. If things upset you, please take them to the talk page instead of escalating it to an edit war. Thanks. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 18:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Blocked

Hello. Due to your consistent edit warring and rudeness towards other users, you have been blocked for a month. You are fully aware of how things are done on Bulbapedia, do not try to call foul. We do not assume moves are what they are based on animation, that is called speculation and you could be 100% wrong. We need a move to be explicitly said (or "spoonfed" by your definition) so that way, we cannot be incorrect. Yes, I have a page in my userspace detailing move we can assume based on animation. But if you actually care to notice, those are moves with consistent and unique animations. Hydro PUmp does not have a consistent and unique animation, regardless of Hydro Pump "looking" bigger than Water Gun. The animators can make Water Gun look bigger and powerful because plot convenience, they can do whatever the hell they want. Next time, once you've come back, do not - I repeat - DO NOT run for that revert button and DISCUSS any issues you have on the talk page of the user or the conflicting articles. Failure to adhere to this warning will lead to a far more severe punishment. Thank you.--ForceFire 15:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Blocked, once again

As I've stated before in the past, do not add a move unless it was explicitly called out. Because of your refusal to listen to repeated warnings, you have been blocked yet again. Please do not do this again or else the next one may very well be permanent. Ataro (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

SM127

Please don't vandalise pages by deleting important information like you just did on SM127's page again (https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=SM127&action=edit&undoafter=2989572&undo=2989573). Things are put there for a reason. If you haven't seen the episode, that is not an excuse. Playerking95 (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

That’s not vandalizing. It can’t master it if it just learned it.--Pikablu (talk) 18:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
It is when it didn't just learn it. As I said, not seeing is the episode is no excuse. Lana says she hopes to mater her move and then Sophocles mentions that he also hopes to master his Vikavolt's Zap Cannon and then Lana complimented the move, which means that he was trying to master it. Playerking95 (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Um, every move is learned with the intent of mastering. Seeing it used without any problems and saying they hoped it worked doesn’t mean it needs mentioned that it was mastered. - unsigned comment from Pikablu (talkcontribs)

Talk page policy

Hey! Please don't forget to sign your talk page messages with four tildes (~). Thank you. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 20:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Mohn's Zoroark‎

I see you have created a page for Gladion’s Zoroark, as Playerking95 has created a page for Mohn's Zoroark‎ which is the same Zoroark‎, I feel your page is redundant.--BigDocFan (talk) 18:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

But mine is more accurate and has more information to it. It’s Gladions Pokemon.--Pikablu (talk) 19:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
True but because they're the same Pokémon, only one page will be used.--BigDocFan (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
That makes sense.--Pikablu (talk) 16:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

SM133

We know Ash is battling Hau, but we don't what the episode is about. All we know is that they'll be battling at some point. Things don't get unhidden until we know for sure. And your recent edit unhid Hala on the page, not Hau. Playerking95 (talk) 19:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Opps, misread it. But we still know Hau is showing up--Pikablu (talk) 19:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
I agree, we know that, but without a summary, a picture, footage or there names in the title, it's still speculation. This site is about facts, which is why things stay hidden until there is confirmation, as likely as we know that the hidden things will happen. Sometimes curveballs gets thrown. Even titles have kind of lied in the past. Playerking95 (talk) 19:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Sure, but how could this possibly be anything else. We have two episode summaries to prove it.--Pikablu (talk) 19:52, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Bird Pokemon that could be owned by other characters. What are the two episode summaries? Unofficially, most if not all of us know it'll be Ash and Hau, but since there is still a low possibility that it could be between other people, it's still speculation. If you speculate, even if the speculation and it's a strong possibility and you end up being wrong, a website can lose credibility. Playerking95 (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
At the same time don’t we lose credibility when we refuse to put information that’s 90% likely?--Pikablu (talk) 15:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Who cares what they think then, because they should understand that this site is about facts and even a 10% or 1% at being wrong would make us look bad for assuming. Other sites have assumes and it doesn't look good. Some sites even has mistakes still up like listing Pokemon that never appeared in an episode. Playerking95 (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

That is bad, but common sense should be used with it. If we’re wrong it can always be changed--Pikablu (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

But the history that it was there will still be available. And admins prefer the less editing as possible. I might not 100% like it, but that's what the admins want. When things are likely going to happen, they remain hidden until it's proven or an episode airs. Playerking95 (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
we don’t always follow that. When a rival had a new pokemon in a preview we list it as theirs even though it can’t be proven yet.--Pikablu (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Pikachu in a cap article

I understand your reasoning, but there is an ongoing discussion at Talk:Ash's Pikachu about splitting the content and a final vote had not yet been reached. Please contribute to the discussion first and wait for an admin to make the final decision before creating an article on this topic. That's policy. Thank you. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 09:02, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Pikablu".