Talk:.4/Featured article candidate

.4

Support (2)

After Missingno., probably one of the best examples of a Glitch Pokémon's page on this pedia. Informative, accurate, clean, thorough, what more is needed? Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 11:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. very good article.--I am the Void 22:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Object (12)

Are ya kiddin' me? This thing is far from featured-worthy, as far as I can see. No content, at all. It's just an average glitch article. --electAbuzzz z 12:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Compared to Missingno., as well as many (Pokémon) articles, it's practically empty. ^tc²₆ tc₂₆ 12:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Doesn't have anything to make it worth a FA title. Though, Charizard (Base Set 4) and Maddie Blaustein (on its talk page they said that it would have only a temporary status, though it's still a featured one) didn't have either. UltimateSephiroth ^{(about me · chat · edits)} 13:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it has what it takes. It appears to be stub-like, Pokémon Wise. Other articles such as Brock are clean, concise, and very detailed. --Greenギャラドス 14:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
The article is pratically empty compared to missingno or any other FAC article. ---> 223☆Dåv]d 14:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
*yawns* A very weak article. Very bland...sorry... ^ht 14 02:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
What's next? Ké...... Cu bo ne King 03:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Missingno. is a featured article because it has more than four paragraphs of non-trivial text, and actually explains how and why this Pokémon appears. This one fails to meet every standard. If it's the next best thing Project GlitchDex has, then I am highly concerned. —darklordtrom 04:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't think this would be a good FA. There's nothing that really stands out about this article... it's just a regular Gen I Glitch Pokémon article. ZestyCactus 05:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Agree with everything above. I wasn't for Missingno. being nominated. You think I'd like this? --ケンジの ガール 05:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
*laughs hysterically* You're serious? Someone nominated THIS for an FAC? *facepalm* Compared to Missingno., it's EMPTY. E-123 - Ω ナックルズ 21:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
We already have a featured Glitch article. I don't see any reason for another.--Dark ICE (User:Cold)^{(page, talk)} 14:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Other comments

I demand that this be closed! 1 to 12! ^{I'm back!} Alpha Cu bo ne King 02:36, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Technically two, because whoever "I am the Void" is voted for it too, but even still. :P ZestyCactus 02:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

I am the Void is Mtn otter before he learned about the signature polocy. And as with all featured wannabes, the Editorial Board will discuss the status of the article once the allotted month is up. —darklordtrom 07:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)