User talk:Force Fire/Archive 11: Difference between revisions

→‎Confirmation: new section
(→‎Confirmation: new section)
Line 1,074: Line 1,074:


Prior to Generation VII, it was easy to see which Trainer classes were unique. However, starting with Generation VII, Double Battle Trainer classes actually consist of two Trainers with their own classes in addition to their "combined" class. Do these Generation VII+ cases of unique Double Battle Trainer classes count we unique cases too, even though their members count as members of different Trainer classes? --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 18:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Prior to Generation VII, it was easy to see which Trainer classes were unique. However, starting with Generation VII, Double Battle Trainer classes actually consist of two Trainers with their own classes in addition to their "combined" class. Do these Generation VII+ cases of unique Double Battle Trainer classes count we unique cases too, even though their members count as members of different Trainer classes? --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 18:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
== Confirmation  ==
You’re being hypocritical. First you claim we need proof to put something and now you’re saying we don’t. Which is it? Because it seems it’s whichever you decide on when you wake up in the morning[[User:Pikablu|Pikablu]] ([[User talk:Pikablu|talk]]) 13:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
1,262

edits