20,870
edits
User talk:Yaronos: Difference between revisions
Undo revision 3097659 by TheICTLiker4 (talk) - Talk page comments cannot be removed unless a page is being archived or a red link is being fixed.
(→Type Changing on move pages: new section) |
(Undo revision 3097659 by TheICTLiker4 (talk) - Talk page comments cannot be removed unless a page is being archived or a red link is being fixed.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
Before updating a mon's typing/breeding group on move pages, please make sure you've considered the generation the table is under. You've done a few edits changing mons like Cleffa to Fairy under Gen 3 games for example. [[User:Lanthanum|Lanthanum]] ([[User talk:Lanthanum|talk]]) 15:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC) | Before updating a mon's typing/breeding group on move pages, please make sure you've considered the generation the table is under. You've done a few edits changing mons like Cleffa to Fairy under Gen 3 games for example. [[User:Lanthanum|Lanthanum]] ([[User talk:Lanthanum|talk]]) 15:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
:I know... but I've that in Bulbapedia many pre-gen Gen 6 learnsets being updated with the Fairy type, so I think all of them should be updated, especially because they can be transferred into future generations. There are also situations like the [[Headbutt]] TM section, since it's TM in Let's Go, Clefairy was changed to a Fairy type and its STAB is removed, but what about Snubbull? Make it a still a Normal type is true, but ruin the consistency of the age, as well as make visitors confused.[[User:Yaronos|Yaronos]] ([[User talk:Yaronos|talk]]) 17:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
:: That's fair. I'm just going along with what I've seen are the site's standards, which I think are still best to follow logically. Since moves are categorized by generation, for special moves, I think it's best to follow the generation's context, assuming they won't be transferred. People might be playing Gen 2 for example and be confused why the Bulbapedia listing of a type/breeding group isn't consistent with the game he/she's playing. For the TM example you gave tho, I think that would be one case where consistency in typing for the whole table is more important than accurate info for a specific gen. [[User:Lanthanum|Lanthanum]] ([[User talk:Lanthanum|talk]]) 00:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::This applies to egg groups as well. --<span lang="ja">[[User:TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#333">'''TheI'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#f30">'''CTLi'''</span>]][[User talk:TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#bbb">'''ker4'''</span>]]</span> 14:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC) | |||