1,953
edits
Talk:Leaf (game): Difference between revisions
→The "Green/Leaf" title is REALLY necessary?
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 426: | Line 426: | ||
:::::::::Obviously they can be the same people. The USUM artbook even has a picture of Elio and Selene (SM style) direct replacement for new clothing. [[User:E9310103838|E9310103838]] ([[User talk:E9310103838|talk]]) 00:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC) | :::::::::Obviously they can be the same people. The USUM artbook even has a picture of Elio and Selene (SM style) direct replacement for new clothing. [[User:E9310103838|E9310103838]] ([[User talk:E9310103838|talk]]) 00:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
{{indent}}So the way the article is currently written, it seems to be treating Green’s iterations from FRLG and LGPE as the same character. Putting my personal opinions on whether they’re the same character or not aside, this still to me seems super confusing. I know I’m beating a dead horse but honestly it’s ridiculous to have two names for (what we are treating as) one character. Assuming that they’re the same character, why does her being explicitly given a name in LGPE not override whatever Kotobukiya decides to name their figure, especially before it’s even officially released? Using two names for one character is honestly just confusing as hell to read, and the fact that one is from the games explicitly and the other is not just adds to that. | |||
We should use one name universally if we’re going to treat Green as one character, which seems to be what BP is wanting to do. --[[User:Celadonkey|Celadonkey]] ([[User talk:Celadonkey|talk]]) 13:14, 5 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
== To be or not to be that's the question. (Or why is that even a question in the first place?) == | == To be or not to be that's the question. (Or why is that even a question in the first place?) == | ||