19,926
edits
Talk:Villainous team: Difference between revisions
→Move: antagonist team
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) (→Move: antagonist team: bad sig) |
|||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
:::If nothing else, though, I think the intro is long overdue for a rework. Whatever the term, not all of them are that "villainous". [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) | :::If nothing else, though, I think the intro is long overdue for a rework. Whatever the term, not all of them are that "villainous". [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) | ||
:::Bad sig [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 23:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC) | :::Bad sig [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 23:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::My sentiment sort of is, if "villainous team" is indeed the most common/prominent official term, then that's what we should use. It doesn't really feel appropriate for us to replace the term just because it feels like the official term isn't fitting enough. That doesn't mean we can't also put a note in the intro that says something like "Despite the name, newer games feature teams that are less traditionally villainous but still play an antagonistic role" or something of the sort. As for whether certain other organizations fit into this article, I'd say only if they've been grouped with the other villainous teams officially. If not, a separate, perhaps broader page, or category, could be made for those. [[User:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><font color="#00d1bc">'''Land'''</font>]][[User talk:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><small><font color="#006699">'''fish7'''</font></small></span></span>]] 21:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC) | |||