editlock-exempt
1,925
edits
Talk:Spiky Shield (move): Difference between revisions
→Damage-dealing vs. non-damaging?: new section
PartHunter (talk | contribs) (→Image: new section) |
(→Damage-dealing vs. non-damaging?: new section) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I don't think the first image for this move is nessesary, as it is just a Chesnaught partway through one of Chesnaught's attack animations, not part of the move animation itself. [[User:PartHunter|PartHunter]] ([[User talk:PartHunter|talk]]) 05:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | I don't think the first image for this move is nessesary, as it is just a Chesnaught partway through one of Chesnaught's attack animations, not part of the move animation itself. [[User:PartHunter|PartHunter]] ([[User talk:PartHunter|talk]]) 05:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Damage-dealing vs. non-damaging? == | |||
Currently this move is listed as a "damaging-dealing" move. While technically not wrong, that is not the primary effect of the attack, like other status moves. Other status moves that place a 'damage-dealing' effect like {{m|Nightmare}} are listed as non-damaging, and {{m|Metronome}}, which can call a damaging attack, is also listed as non-damaging. Should damage-dealing be replaced here? | |||