Talk:Type: Difference between revisions

Line 1,358: Line 1,358:
::::::::It definitely could, but I don't think the two should be conflated. I think it's two separate discussions; the inclusion of the type in the template is a question of usability, and should be (largely) independent of whether or not it has a distinct mainspace article.
::::::::It definitely could, but I don't think the two should be conflated. I think it's two separate discussions; the inclusion of the type in the template is a question of usability, and should be (largely) independent of whether or not it has a distinct mainspace article.
::::::::(And while the Spanish wiki does include it [[:es:Plantilla:Tipos|in its template]], I wouldn't want to propose it for ours, not even if we had a Bird page.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 17:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
::::::::(And while the Spanish wiki does include it [[:es:Plantilla:Tipos|in its template]], I wouldn't want to propose it for ours, not even if we had a Bird page.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 17:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
:Being a scrapped / prototype type that goes unused outside of bizarre glitching oddities in Gen 1 games, I feel it deserves it's own page. Much like the ???-type which eventually retired, should be fine as long as it is noted to be a leftover generation 1 type from some point in development. ''[[User:Frozen Fennec|<span style="color:teal">Frozen</span>]] [[User talk:Frozen Fennec|<span style="color:green">Fennec</span>]]'' 15:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)