77,624
edits
Talk:Pokémon-Amie: Difference between revisions
→Affection split
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 241: | Line 241: | ||
Affection is strongly tied to Pokémon-Amie, but it's not entirely dependent on it, and it has several applications outside of it (such as in-battle bonuses and evolving Eevee into Sylveon). A significant portion of this article is dedicated to affection, which has enough content to be its own article. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | Affection is strongly tied to Pokémon-Amie, but it's not entirely dependent on it, and it has several applications outside of it (such as in-battle bonuses and evolving Eevee into Sylveon). A significant portion of this article is dedicated to affection, which has enough content to be its own article. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
:It's a bit weird, though, that you've put the template on the Stats section, where affection is definitely not the only thing it talks about. Since, from your comment above, it seems affection is really the only thing you're concerned about, then I suppose the split would mostly remove the Affection benefits and Battle quotes sections from this page? And if that'd be the bulk of the new page, IMO it might not be the ''most'' robust page. I don't really see how anything else from that section could rightly be removed in a split (though maybe the new page would note a few things besides those sections, without ''removing'' the same info from here)—unless the new page will not be "Affection" after all but something encompassing all the stats. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 12:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | :It's a bit weird, though, that you've put the template on the Stats section, where affection is definitely not the only thing it talks about. Since, from your comment above, it seems affection is really the only thing you're concerned about, then I suppose the split would mostly remove the Affection benefits and Battle quotes sections from this page? And if that'd be the bulk of the new page, IMO it might not be the ''most'' robust page. I don't really see how anything else from that section could rightly be removed in a split (though maybe the new page would note a few things besides those sections, without ''removing'' the same info from here)—unless the new page will not be "Affection" after all but something encompassing all the stats. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 12:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
::I didn't mean to suggest that the entire section should be split, just that all (or the vast majority) of content that would be on the proposed separate affection page would come from that section. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 01:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC) | |||