Talk:Blizzard (move): Difference between revisions

m
Undo revision 1243074 by San (talk)don't respond to year-old convos
m (Undo revision 1243074 by San (talk)don't respond to year-old convos)
Line 6: Line 6:


100% accuracy or [http://www.smogon.com/dp/moves/blizzard cannot miss]? The same goes for Thunder in rain. I ask this because Bulbapedia has consistently kept to 100% when mentioning this, but frankly, I've never had Blizzard missing against a Brightpowdered, Double Teaming Froslass in Hail. --[[User:Jayc|Jayc]] 08:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
100% accuracy or [http://www.smogon.com/dp/moves/blizzard cannot miss]? The same goes for Thunder in rain. I ask this because Bulbapedia has consistently kept to 100% when mentioning this, but frankly, I've never had Blizzard missing against a Brightpowdered, Double Teaming Froslass in Hail. --[[User:Jayc|Jayc]] 08:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
As of HG and SS blizzard does not break through detect or protect in hail. So far I think all the main refrence sites out there have missed this. [[User:San|San]] 16:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


== Uh... Sheer Cold ==
== Uh... Sheer Cold ==
22,510

edits