Page history
14 March 2024
→Search Level: Updated
−453
→Shiny probability: Add full list of distinct Shiny rates
+2,515
Replace empirical "Benefits" table with actual values. Move Chain section above Search Level, as the Chain is relevant to Shiny rates.
+564
→Search Level: Rewrite for ease of reading, without adding new information
−755
Undo revision 3955119 by Lewtwo (talk)This tweet is already linked in a notice template the appropriate section that will need slight adjustments
−138
no edit summary
m+138
→Search Level
m+98
13 March 2024
15 January 2024
6 January 2024
→Chaining
m+61
→Special qualities: Numerical error; at 99 you have +19 levels, at 100 the chain resets and you get +0.
m
26 August 2023
3 June 2023
2 February 2021
19 October 2020
18 October 2020
4 June 2020
20 February 2020
17 June 2019
8 June 2019
11 May 2018
10 May 2018
9 February 2018
20 January 2018
23 September 2017
22 September 2017
Undo revision 2692456 by Goomba98 (talk)I don't think so. Try and read very carefully. Feel free to use a talk page to ask questions
m→Mark of completion
m
29 July 2017
4 June 2017
27 January 2017
9 January 2017
→Search Level: A whole explanation as the lead sentence is still better
m−12
→Search Level: That was a really awkward place in the sentence to add that. It's best not to divide a thing that needs to be explained and the parenthetical explaining it.
+15
8 January 2017
1 December 2016
11 September 2016
→Shiny probability: Trying to draw a distinction between the number before and after being divided by 100
+45
→Shiny probability: This is probably just like the other attributes. I.e., it's not exactly the "DexNav", it's more "hidden Pokemon" (which you don't have to *use* the DexNav for)
m+6
reference
m+152
A JP guide apparently said stuff about some qualities... "Chaining" doesn't "increase" Shiny odds except at two specific points. It's Search Level; you don't even need a chain
+500
10 September 2016
7 August 2016
The linked page looks to be entirely self-published research by the anonymous user who added it, and I'm not sure I trust it without a better source. ||| In any case, if it is legit, we need to have a full explanation here, not just "click the link."
−544
→External links
+201
→Chaining
+343
18 June 2016
→Mark of completion: Nope, it's what's /left/ to complete... Not all places have the same number of available methods
−24
no edit summary
+153
→Mark of completion: typo
m+1
→Mark of completion
+562