24
edits
User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/8: Difference between revisions
→Wondercard/5 layout: new section
Rigel Kent (talk | contribs) (→Wondercard/5 layout: new section) |
|||
| Line 605: | Line 605: | ||
Dunno where else to suggest this except a staff member's talk page, since it's not exactly something I can put together in my userspace, and since our Head of Games seems to have been offline for months, you seemed to be the person who is next-most-closely-involved with our core series pages. Anyway, I think it would be very useful to have a ''Category: Protection moves'' to include Protect, Detect, Spiky Shield, King's Shield, etc., and a ''Category: Moves that can break protection'' to include Feint, Phantom Force, Hyperspace Hole, etc. This way, we could just link to these categories when describing the interactions between the two types of moves, instead of having to list every single one on every page for any of these moves (and having to update the descriptions every time new moves are introduced). I hope you like this idea! Thanks! [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC) | Dunno where else to suggest this except a staff member's talk page, since it's not exactly something I can put together in my userspace, and since our Head of Games seems to have been offline for months, you seemed to be the person who is next-most-closely-involved with our core series pages. Anyway, I think it would be very useful to have a ''Category: Protection moves'' to include Protect, Detect, Spiky Shield, King's Shield, etc., and a ''Category: Moves that can break protection'' to include Feint, Phantom Force, Hyperspace Hole, etc. This way, we could just link to these categories when describing the interactions between the two types of moves, instead of having to list every single one on every page for any of these moves (and having to update the descriptions every time new moves are introduced). I hope you like this idea! Thanks! [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Moves that break protection would be a good idea for a category, now that Hoopa's signature moves mean there are quite a few. You'll find that I already made {{cat|protection moves}} 2 years ago. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC) | :Moves that break protection would be a good idea for a category, now that Hoopa's signature moves mean there are quite a few. You'll find that I already made {{cat|protection moves}} 2 years ago. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Wondercard/5 layout == | |||
Hi, I'm leaving you this message because you are one of the most recent contributors to the template {{tl|Wondercard/5}}. | |||
I have identified performance issues with this template, such as unnecessary rendering of hidden tables, and layout engine crashes on some browsers. I have proposed an alternate method to achieve the same visual layout with more lightweight markup at [[Project:Sandbox#Wonder Card Gen 5 mockup]]. It has been suggested at [[Template talk:Wondercard/5]], however, that all layout elements on this wiki must be HTML <table>s, and never HTML <div>s, <blockquote>s, <p>s, or any other element. As you are familiar with this template, I'd like your input on the matter, especially on whether you find the nested layout tables more helpful for editing than a lightweight equivalent. [[User:Rigel Kent|<ruby lang="ja">ライケン<rp> </rp><rt lang="en">Rigel Kent</rt></ruby>]] ([[User talk:Rigel Kent|talk]]) 01:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC) | |||