29,813
edits
User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/8: Difference between revisions
→Move entries: new section
Rigel Kent (talk | contribs) (→Wondercard/5 layout: new section) |
Oneofthosedf (talk | contribs) (→Move entries: new section) |
||
| Line 611: | Line 611: | ||
I have identified performance issues with this template, such as unnecessary rendering of hidden tables, and layout engine crashes on some browsers. I have proposed an alternate method to achieve the same visual layout with more lightweight markup at [[Project:Sandbox#Wonder Card Gen 5 mockup]]. It has been suggested at [[Template talk:Wondercard/5]], however, that all layout elements on this wiki must be HTML <table>s, and never HTML <div>s, <blockquote>s, <p>s, or any other element. As you are familiar with this template, I'd like your input on the matter, especially on whether you find the nested layout tables more helpful for editing than a lightweight equivalent. [[User:Rigel Kent|<ruby lang="ja">ライケン<rp> </rp><rt lang="en">Rigel Kent</rt></ruby>]] ([[User talk:Rigel Kent|talk]]) 01:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC) | I have identified performance issues with this template, such as unnecessary rendering of hidden tables, and layout engine crashes on some browsers. I have proposed an alternate method to achieve the same visual layout with more lightweight markup at [[Project:Sandbox#Wonder Card Gen 5 mockup]]. It has been suggested at [[Template talk:Wondercard/5]], however, that all layout elements on this wiki must be HTML <table>s, and never HTML <div>s, <blockquote>s, <p>s, or any other element. As you are familiar with this template, I'd like your input on the matter, especially on whether you find the nested layout tables more helpful for editing than a lightweight equivalent. [[User:Rigel Kent|<ruby lang="ja">ライケン<rp> </rp><rt lang="en">Rigel Kent</rt></ruby>]] ([[User talk:Rigel Kent|talk]]) 01:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Move entries == | |||
Hey, I want to ask you about something that has been bothering me for over a year now. The Gen 6 column on move articles. [http://image.prntscr.com/image/a8b392dddae242cd84b3c689cef2beb4.png] | |||
I've read one of your posts where you said that dividing the Gen 6 column was not possible with the current template. I want to ask why is that? I looked up the source and while I don't fully understand it, it doesn't seem impossible to replicate the subcolumn feature. I understand that the problem here is not with laziness but I'm really curious why this hasn't been done yet. | |||
[[User:Oneofthosedf|Oneofthosedf]] ([[User talk:Oneofthosedf|talk]]) 16:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC) | |||