2,119
edits
User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/7: Difference between revisions
User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/7 (view source)
Revision as of 23:50, 19 March 2013
, 19 March 2013→Pokémon News Machine
| Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
It's all for now but it's already more than enough! [[User:SatoMew2|<b><span style="color:blue">Sato</span></b>]][[User talk:SatoMew2|<b><span style="color:pink">Mew</span></b>]] 17:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC) | It's all for now but it's already more than enough! [[User:SatoMew2|<b><span style="color:blue">Sato</span></b>]][[User talk:SatoMew2|<b><span style="color:pink">Mew</span></b>]] 17:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
==Naming conventions for glitch pokémon sprites== | |||
Recently I've been very confused about this. I read what was stipulated [[Bulbapedia:Project GlitchDex#Glitch Pokémon sprites|here]], and immediately noticed that it wasn't being followed on most images. There were many different models on those uploads - how I wish autoconfirmed users could move pages on the archives just like in bulbapedia... WAIT! Before you start doing anything, let me tell you why am I really concerned on this matter, which is the defect of the current convention: what about pokémon with more than one front/back sprite? Maybe putting a "2" at the end of one, but... what about Missingno.? Its sprite depends on the hexadecimal! And a possible other defect: are there any glitch pokémon that can either be shiny or not? | |||
So, would you agree with, before a mass move of pages, changing the convention to "[game]Glitch[hex][_b][_2].png" [[User:TheOriginalOne|<span style="color:#9E0508">'''The'''</span>]][[User talk:TheOriginalOne|<span style="color:#5D9160">'''Original'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/TheOriginalOne|<span style="color:#60AFFE">'''One'''</span>]] 23:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC) | |||