424
edits
User talk:KevlarX290: Difference between revisions
→SM Era subsets number
Ruixiang95 (talk | contribs) (→SM Era subsets number: new section) |
KevlarX290 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Hi, I saw your edits of changing the number if each Japanese SM Era subset. I believed the number was correct before but I have to check with nuva-kal since he was first to make changes to thd number being included as SM overall. Asking you before I ask him. You decreased the set number by one, did you exclude The Best Of XY subset? I think nuva-kal counted that in. Thanks. — '''[[User:Ruixiang95|<span style="color:#9932CC;">Ruixiang</span>]][[User talk:Ruixiang95|<span style="color:#FF8C00;">95</span>]]''' 11:10, 8 April 2019 (UTC) | Hi, I saw your edits of changing the number if each Japanese SM Era subset. I believed the number was correct before but I have to check with nuva-kal since he was first to make changes to thd number being included as SM overall. Asking you before I ask him. You decreased the set number by one, did you exclude The Best Of XY subset? I think nuva-kal counted that in. Thanks. — '''[[User:Ruixiang95|<span style="color:#9932CC;">Ruixiang</span>]][[User talk:Ruixiang95|<span style="color:#FF8C00;">95</span>]]''' 11:10, 8 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
Hiya, I believe my numbers are correct. I even double-checked before editing them. The Best of XY subset was not included as one of the numbers, it doesn't appear to have been prior to my edits, otherwise Shining Legends should have been 4th, GX Battle Boost 5th etc. [[User:KevlarX290|KevlarX290]] ([[User talk:KevlarX290|talk]]) 11:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC) | |||