Talk:Type: Difference between revisions

299 bytes added ,  19 December 2008
(→‎Secondary/Primary: new section)
Line 556: Line 556:
I was thinking we should list the stat averages of not only all Pokémon of the type, but also all fully evolved Pokémon of the type. Does anyone else think we should do this?
I was thinking we should list the stat averages of not only all Pokémon of the type, but also all fully evolved Pokémon of the type. Does anyone else think we should do this?
:Actually, that's a good idea. Care to calculate this? '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 08:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
:Actually, that's a good idea. Care to calculate this? '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 08:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
== Secondary/Primary ==
I think it deserves its own section: is there any actual difference, game-wise, if the Pokémon is primary-typed or secondary-typed? I fail to see any... -- [[User:Pro-mole|Professional Mole]] ([[User talk:Pro-mole|<small>Talk here</small>]]) 22:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
83

edits