18,700
edits
Talk:Trio master: Difference between revisions
moving new conversation to bottom of page
Lugia+Ho-Oh (talk | contribs) |
(moving new conversation to bottom of page) |
||
| Line 451: | Line 451: | ||
Shouldn't Zygarde also be listed? This one guards the ecosystem by overseeing the cycle of life (Xerneas) and death (Yveltal), and intervenes when the natural order is upset. Its ability and signature moves are also specifically designed to counter Xerneas and Yveltal. [[User:Golden Trainer|Golden Trainer]] ([[User talk:Golden Trainer|talk]]) 14:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | Shouldn't Zygarde also be listed? This one guards the ecosystem by overseeing the cycle of life (Xerneas) and death (Yveltal), and intervenes when the natural order is upset. Its ability and signature moves are also specifically designed to counter Xerneas and Yveltal. [[User:Golden Trainer|Golden Trainer]] ([[User talk:Golden Trainer|talk]]) 14:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Resolving Trio master Issue == | == Resolving Trio master Issue == | ||
| Line 471: | Line 467: | ||
::I have to agree with both this and an older topic by user Satosuke. The concept of a "Master" among a group of legends is somewhere between canon and fanon, and it'd be a waste to completely eliminate it. But Crown Tundra's introduction of Regileki and Regidrago makes it ''really'' hard to justify continuing to use the term "Trio" for all the others. What it may be time to do, in my opinion, is combine all the groupings into one super reference. The trios, the duos (Eon, Tower, Lunar, and the Cyclizar relatives), and now a [[Treasures of Ruin|legendary quartet]] that has no "Master". All the mentions of a group of legends, regardless of quantity, generation, or presence of a "Master", could be plausibly covered in one article. [[User:Schiffy|<span style="color:#006400;">I don't even give a Schif</span>]] ([[User talk:Schiffy|<span style="color:#FF6600;">Talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Schiffy|<span style="color:#FF0000;">Contribs</span>]]) 16:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC) | ::I have to agree with both this and an older topic by user Satosuke. The concept of a "Master" among a group of legends is somewhere between canon and fanon, and it'd be a waste to completely eliminate it. But Crown Tundra's introduction of Regileki and Regidrago makes it ''really'' hard to justify continuing to use the term "Trio" for all the others. What it may be time to do, in my opinion, is combine all the groupings into one super reference. The trios, the duos (Eon, Tower, Lunar, and the Cyclizar relatives), and now a [[Treasures of Ruin|legendary quartet]] that has no "Master". All the mentions of a group of legends, regardless of quantity, generation, or presence of a "Master", could be plausibly covered in one article. [[User:Schiffy|<span style="color:#006400;">I don't even give a Schif</span>]] ([[User talk:Schiffy|<span style="color:#FF6600;">Talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Schiffy|<span style="color:#FF0000;">Contribs</span>]]) 16:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Addressing Deletion == | |||
Guys, I don't think we should delete this article. It may not be fact, but it's still Pokémon-related lore, therefore serving as Pokémon-related information, which is the literal reason why Bulbapedia even exists. Do you really think we should delete it? [[User:Lugia+Ho-Oh|Lugia+Ho-Oh]] ([[User talk:Lugia+Ho-Oh|talk]]) 01:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC) | |||