604
edits
Talk:Kalos Route 2: Difference between revisions
→Calculating Percentages: new section
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) m (→Caterpie: uh...) |
SeanWheeler (talk | contribs) (→Calculating Percentages: new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I think the list of wild Pokemon should be revised. I found a Caterpie in the forest and I'm playing version X --[[User:CrazyMagmar|Dunsparce can learn Double-Edge. |B) DEAL WITH IT.]] ([[User talk:CrazyMagmar|talk]]) 00:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC) | I think the list of wild Pokemon should be revised. I found a Caterpie in the forest and I'm playing version X --[[User:CrazyMagmar|Dunsparce can learn Double-Edge. |B) DEAL WITH IT.]] ([[User talk:CrazyMagmar|talk]]) 00:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
:In [[Santalune Forest]], not here? 'Cuz that'd be right. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 00:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC) | :In [[Santalune Forest]], not here? 'Cuz that'd be right. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 00:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Calculating Percentages == | |||
Can we calculate the percentages of how the wild Pokémon appear? Or would it be too speculative? My calculations are that Caterpie, Weedle Pidgey and Zigzagoon each has a 11% chance of appearing while Fletchling, Scatterbug and Bunnelby have 22% chance. Although, I'm not totally sure. Any of them can be off. In fact, the percentages would total up to 99% meaning one of them can have 1% more. Can someone figure out these calculations? I would like to see numbers to be consistent with the other regions. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 18:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC) | |||