Meowth (Team Rocket)
Support (2)
- It is a very detailed and descriptive article. Support.--Smartkidhen 23:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- The article is very well built and extremely full of info. Support--Pikachuawsome
Object (6)
- Disagree. This article is decent, but by no means FAC-worthy.
No movesets are done (which I'll do now), andthere is no manga info. There is too much text in the summary section... not very organized... ht14 22:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- No. It's OK, but no Featured article. It's incomplete, anyway. CuboneKing 21:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, but No. I don't see how an incomplete article can be considered for a featured article in the first place. If the Manga section was done, then I would gladly change my veiws, but... From Samjohn95 23:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- lol, seriously? The
{{incomplete}}followed right away by the{{FAC notice}}is hilarious.*-- Iron ICE (User:Cold)(page, talk) 15:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC) - While the page's character section is very descriptive, the manga section is very empty. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 12:55, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Like others have said, if the article is incomplete, then how could it be a FA? Besides, the "character" section is way too long. Needs summarizing. ZestyCactus 02:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Other comments
It's so strange how an incomplete article is even allowed to be a FAC. CuboneKing 01:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)