2,613
edits
Talk:Generation VII: Difference between revisions
→Trivium dispute
(→Trivium dispute: On second thought, a clarification is probably necessary, since in retrospect my phrasing was incomplete.) |
Blueapple128 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
:::Uh, I see that a lot in trivia, actually. There's Aegislash, Jynx, Sawsbuck, and I forgot what else. [[User:Unowninator|¿¡Unowninator?!]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 20:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | :::Uh, I see that a lot in trivia, actually. There's Aegislash, Jynx, Sawsbuck, and I forgot what else. [[User:Unowninator|¿¡Unowninator?!]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 20:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
::::Yeah, if the whole evolution family has the same unique type combination we mention it. But if some do and some don't (like this signature move/Ability thing), we only list the ones that do, not the ones that don't. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 20:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | ::::Yeah, if the whole evolution family has the same unique type combination we mention it. But if some do and some don't (like this signature move/Ability thing), we only list the ones that do, not the ones that don't. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 20:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::::The point is that "these two Pokemon are the only ones to have this type combination" is normally invalid since there's more than one, unless both are part of the same evolution family. This means that grouping stuff by evolution family and treating them as one group is allowed and not arbitrary. [[User:Blueapple128|Blueapple128]] ([[User talk:Blueapple128|talk]]) 22:50, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | |||