Talk:Legendary Pokémon: Difference between revisions

Line 393: Line 393:
:::Indeed those two facts make all of them objectively ''legendaries'', period <s>(unfortunately logical thinking is not the strongest point of everyone here)</s>. The only possible counterargument here is that at least one those facts is incorrect, and even in that case, it should be justified for us to trust official statements as long as we can't prove they're false. Finally, I hope personal biases like "Type: Null just ''can't'' be a legendary! GTS ''must'' be lying!" aren't stalling this...--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 22:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
:::Indeed those two facts make all of them objectively ''legendaries'', period <s>(unfortunately logical thinking is not the strongest point of everyone here)</s>. The only possible counterargument here is that at least one those facts is incorrect, and even in that case, it should be justified for us to trust official statements as long as we can't prove they're false. Finally, I hope personal biases like "Type: Null just ''can't'' be a legendary! GTS ''must'' be lying!" aren't stalling this...--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 22:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
::::So is it ok to say that they're legendary now? I don't want to edit anything w/o confirmation from a mod. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#287a43">Celad</span>]][[User_talk:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#e85545">onkey</span>]] 22:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
::::So is it ok to say that they're legendary now? I don't want to edit anything w/o confirmation from a mod. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#287a43">Celad</span>]][[User_talk:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#e85545">onkey</span>]] 22:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
:::::FWIW, a very explicit, unambiguous statement is always *best*. Taking the twist and turns of inference always leaves a door for some mistake somewhere, somehow (and I don't mean by the inferrers).
:::::That said, I understand the logic and can't argue it. Just, like I said, I would personally be happiest to have a very explicit attribution. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 22:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)