1,953
edits
Talk:Legendary Pokémon: Difference between revisions
→Legendary Disputes Part X
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) (→Legendary Disputes Part X: New comments go at the end) |
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 345: | Line 345: | ||
::"The GTS filter means they are either Legendaries or Mythicals, but we don't know which"—well, they're obviously not Mythicals, so, by using the process of elemination, we can conclude that they must be Legendaries. Therefore, the GTS should be enough to prove that they are Legendaries; however, it seems like the staff wants to wait for official confirmation, which I can understand, even if I disagree. But, I haven't found any official confirmation for [[Marshadow]] either, so by that logic, shouldn't we delete that article? —[[User:MartinZ|MartinZ]] ([[User talk:MartinZ|talk]]) 20:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC) | ::"The GTS filter means they are either Legendaries or Mythicals, but we don't know which"—well, they're obviously not Mythicals, so, by using the process of elemination, we can conclude that they must be Legendaries. Therefore, the GTS should be enough to prove that they are Legendaries; however, it seems like the staff wants to wait for official confirmation, which I can understand, even if I disagree. But, I haven't found any official confirmation for [[Marshadow]] either, so by that logic, shouldn't we delete that article? —[[User:MartinZ|MartinZ]] ([[User talk:MartinZ|talk]]) 20:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::Marshadow is in the games. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 21:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC) | :::Marshadow is in the games. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 21:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::I think MartinZ's point was that they haven't been officially confirmed to exist. IIRC, in Gen VI, we didn't have pages for Diancie, Hoopa, or Volcanion until they were announced. ----[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#98CC00">Celadonkey</span>]] 01:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC) | |||