637
edits
User talk:Nuva-kal: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
(→TCG attacks being used again: new section) |
RotaRaichu (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
[http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Wurmple_%28Roaring_Skies_3%29&diff=prev&oldid=2275324 Please don't remove these]. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 21:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Wurmple_%28Roaring_Skies_3%29&diff=prev&oldid=2275324 Please don't remove these]. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 21:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Tretta Class Hyphenation == | |||
(Copied from project discussion because my years of lurking [seriously I started lurking when TTE was EiC] has taught me that no one reads the project discussions) I've been hyphenating Tretta classes if I see them used as an adjective, similar to the MoS guideline on type. For example I edit to XXXX is a Normal-class Tretta. Is there any policy on this, or should they be hyphenated the same way as type? [[User:RotaRaichu|RotaRaichu]] ([[User talk:RotaRaichu|talk]]) 04:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | |||