139
edits
Talk:Fake Pokémon: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
--[[User:MsIsamisa|MsIsamisa]] 16:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC) | --[[User:MsIsamisa|MsIsamisa]] 16:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Sounds like 100% speculations since as far as I know, GameFreak has never announced making a fake Pokemon into a real one. Just someone with a wild idea is all. ''[[User:Frozen Fennec|<span style="color:teal">Frozen</span>]] [[User talk:Frozen Fennec|<span style="color:green">Fennec</span>]]'' 17:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC) | :Sounds like 100% speculations since as far as I know, GameFreak has never announced making a fake Pokemon into a real one. Just someone with a wild idea is all. ''[[User:Frozen Fennec|<span style="color:teal">Frozen</span>]] [[User talk:Frozen Fennec|<span style="color:green">Fennec</span>]]'' 17:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
==Mewthree== | |||
First, why does Mewthree get its own section? Sure, it's one of the more well-known fake Pokémon... but so is Pikablu and many of the other Pokégods. The only difference is that Mewthree has appeared in hacked games. | |||
Also, the quote "''it was given an official mention in Mewtwo Strikes Back, where the scientists responsible for creating Mewtwo, commenting on the success of its creation, decided to start making Mewthree''" is not true. Unless it was only in the Japanese version or in some foreign dub... but there was never any mention of a Mewthree in the American dub. If it was Japanese-only, some note should be made of that. Or was that statement from "The Birth of Mewtwo" (which was included with Mewtwo Returns, not Mewtwo Strikes Back)... I've never seen that so I suppose it could have been mentioned there, but if so, that needs to corrected (to say "The Birth of Mewtwo", not "Mewtwo Strikes Back"). [[User:Dannyjenn|Dannyjenn]] 15:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC) | |||