Talk:Pokémon Red and Green beta: Difference between revisions

Talk:Pokémon Red and Green beta (view source)

Revision as of 20:19, 16 March 2012

794 bytes removed , 16 March 2012

Undo revision 1627318 by Dannyjenn (talk) No responding to things over 6 months old.

Frozen Fennec

Leadership Board, Administrators

21,038

edits

@@ Line 126: / Line 126: @@
 == 190 pokemon were originally planned ==
 since last year we know that originally there were 190 pokemon planned for Red and green, http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78267 , I think that's something important that should be noted at least in this article. [[User:Gwonam|Gwonam]] 17:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
-:Well, I don't exactly trust that interview... it's just summarized (not word-for-word of what was actually said), and it wasn't conducted as an interview (it was just some guy asking Morimoto some questions on the spot)... who knows how accurate or inaccurate it is.  And the fact that Morimoto said "not Ho-Oh. He wasn't made earlier" doesn't help at all, since he was in the first episode and clearly made early on (showing that there was either a translation error or someone misheard someone or Morimoto was wrong about that).
-:However, I do believe that there were originally 190 Pokémon... it's in the programming (151 Pokémon and 39 MissingNo. makes 190).  I do think there should be some mention of it somewhere on that page. [[User:Dannyjenn|Dannyjenn]] 20:17, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 == Pokémon Red, Green, and Blue beta. ==
 I think that we ''should'' move it to this title. We definately need to make a decision, because we can't just leave that tag there forever. I believe that we should move it, as there are parts of this article that only encompass Red and Green, while other parts include information on the international Red and Blue. [[User:Samjohn95|<font color="Blue">Sam</font>]][[User talk:Samjohn95|<font color="Purple">john</font>]][[Special:contributions/Samjohn95|<font color="Teal">95</font>]] 17:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)