185
edits
Talk:Shiny Pokémon/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
m
→Ranch Mew
No edit summary |
m (→Ranch Mew) |
||
| Line 581: | Line 581: | ||
:::The line you quoted says that "specific nature" Pokemon cannot be shiny, which is true. A specific nature Pokemon has a static PID, which is pre-defined by the game's coding. The nature locked Pokemon cannot be shiny, and are in a sense like the nature locked Wondercards of Gen 4. {{unsigned|Kaphotics}} | :::The line you quoted says that "specific nature" Pokemon cannot be shiny, which is true. A specific nature Pokemon has a static PID, which is pre-defined by the game's coding. The nature locked Pokemon cannot be shiny, and are in a sense like the nature locked Wondercards of Gen 4. {{unsigned|Kaphotics}} | ||
:::: I understand now that the line was referring to the nature locked pokémon, and that Mew isn't a nature locked pokémon. However this doesn't mean that there isn't some other form of shiny check on the Mew (similar to the wonder card shiny check). What I'm asking is has it been '''confirmed''' that is no shiny check on the Mew and Phione? It seems odd that there wouldn't be [[User:Jmvb|Jmvb]] 15:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC) | :::: I understand now that the line was referring to the nature locked pokémon, and that Mew isn't a nature locked pokémon. However this doesn't mean that there isn't some other form of shiny check on the Mew (similar to the wonder card shiny check). What I'm asking is has it been '''confirmed''' that is no shiny check on the Mew and Phione? It seems odd that there wouldn't be [[User:Jmvb|Jmvb]] 15:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::::Nope. The table is wrong, they can't be shiny. Don't know where the proof is that they can't, but knowing Nintendo (as previously explained by SnorlaxMonster in another comment thread) they probably were programmed anti-shiny. | |||
== Arceus == | == Arceus == | ||