21,140
edits
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 13: Difference between revisions
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 13 (view source)
Revision as of 22:21, 23 December 2022
, 23 December 2022→About Appendix:Fan Terminology
IsaacBoi123 (talk | contribs) (Replied) |
|||
| Line 1,241: | Line 1,241: | ||
Hello, I've seen your edit, and you said that too many people try to create this "Early-route Pokémon" page. Why not? It has a lot of Pokémon in that category, and there are pages for other terms, such as "Pseudo-legendary", "Elemental Monkeys" "Hitmons", etc. I would like to know why you think we can't create that page. [[User:IsaacBoi123|IsaacBoi123]] ([[User talk:IsaacBoi123|talk]]) 00:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC) | Hello, I've seen your edit, and you said that too many people try to create this "Early-route Pokémon" page. Why not? It has a lot of Pokémon in that category, and there are pages for other terms, such as "Pseudo-legendary", "Elemental Monkeys" "Hitmons", etc. I would like to know why you think we can't create that page. [[User:IsaacBoi123|IsaacBoi123]] ([[User talk:IsaacBoi123|talk]]) 00:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
:"Early-route Pokémon" is not a well-defined group and is pretty much solely fanon, not an actual term or official group. IIRC, staff has decided that such cases belong on the Fan terminology page. [[User:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><font color="F34134">'''Land'''</font>]][[User talk:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><small><font color="8334B7">'''fish7'''</font></small></span></span>]] 01:17, 22 December 2022 (UTC) | :"Early-route Pokémon" is not a well-defined group and is pretty much solely fanon, not an actual term or official group. IIRC, staff has decided that such cases belong on the Fan terminology page. [[User:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><font color="F34134">'''Land'''</font>]][[User talk:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><small><font color="8334B7">'''fish7'''</font></small></span></span>]] 01:17, 22 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
::But there are pages for the elemental monkeys, and THOSE are fan terms, as well as pseudo-legendaries, etc. So why not Early-route Pokemon? [[User:IsaacBoi123|IsaacBoi123]] ([[User talk:IsaacBoi123|talk]]) 17:09, 23 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
But there are pages for the elemental monkeys, and THOSE are fan terms, as well as pseudo-legendaries, etc. So why not Early-route Pokemon? [[User:IsaacBoi123|IsaacBoi123]] ([[User talk:IsaacBoi123|talk]]) 17:09, 23 December 2022 (UTC) | :::Those are well-defined groups that are officially recognized to some capacity, they just don't have official names. Whereas "early-route Pokémon" is not a well-defined group and not officially acknowledged to any significant degree. Psuedo-legendaries all have a BST of 800 and other traits that make them clearly defined. Similar case with the monkeys. "Early-route Pokémon" don't have much in common aside from being obtained early in the game, which doesn't seem notable. There's really nothing significant about Pokémon that appear early in the game that necessitates its own article. [[User:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><font color="F34134">'''Land'''</font>]][[User talk:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><small><font color="8334B7">'''fish7'''</font></small></span></span>]] 22:21, 23 December 2022 (UTC) | ||