Appendix talk:Glossary (TCG): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (New page: I very much dislike this page. These TCG elements each deserve their own pages, even if they do end up being stubs. The TCG seems to often get the short end of the stick here, and each o...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I very much dislike this page.  These TCG elements each deserve their own pages, even if they do end up being stubs.  The TCG seems to often get the short end of the stick here, and each of these is important enough an element in the TCG to deserve their own pages.  Any comment or pleas before I separate this?  --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 17:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
I very much dislike this page.  These TCG elements each deserve their own pages, even if they do end up being stubs.  The TCG seems to often get the short end of the stick here, and each of these is important enough an element in the TCG to deserve their own pages.  Any comment or pleas before I separate this?  --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 17:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
:I hate stubs, and most of these wouldn't advance past being stubs were they given their own article. Some deserve or have their own articles, yes, but in those cases [[Template:Main]] should be used here. Glossaries are the ideal way to inform someone of basic terms, and most of these are, indeed, basic terms. As such, this article should remain here, even if separate pages for some of the terms are created. [[User:Cipher|<font style="color:#1874CD;">'''''Cipher'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Cipher|<sup style="color:#003F87;">'''''(Talk)'''''</sup>]] 17:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
5,080

edits