30,387
edits
User talk:Singaporean: Difference between revisions
→Anime move mistakes
Singaporean (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
I informed you above about our policy for adding anime moves and that there is a 3 strikes policy for violating it. I am going to give you 24 hours from this message to explain how [[Special:Diff/2870330|this edit]] adding {{m|Psychic}} for [[SM094]] meets the criteria mentioned above for adding anime moves. If you cannot justify your edit, you will receive a strike. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 10:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC) | I informed you above about our policy for adding anime moves and that there is a 3 strikes policy for violating it. I am going to give you 24 hours from this message to explain how [[Special:Diff/2870330|this edit]] adding {{m|Psychic}} for [[SM094]] meets the criteria mentioned above for adding anime moves. If you cannot justify your edit, you will receive a strike. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 10:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
:I understand. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] had already corrected me about the Move set is '''NOT''' {{m|Psychic}}. So, he had already revert the article back to normal. While adding the '''TRUE''' move is {{m|Foresight}} in that article. I'm really sorry as is a very serious matter ever since you had implode this rule. From now onward, I will never wanted to touch the move article ever due to so troublesome, Also again, this is really my careless mistaken. I should had just leave it alone and let you guys handle. Please forgive me, I swear now today I will never editing the move articles again. I promised you, never ever again. [[User:Singaporean|Singaporean]] ([[User talk:Singaporean|talk]]) 11:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC) | :I understand. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] had already corrected me about the Move set is '''NOT''' {{m|Psychic}}. So, he had already revert the article back to normal. While adding the '''TRUE''' move is {{m|Foresight}} in that article. I'm really sorry as is a very serious matter ever since you had implode this rule. From now onward, I will never wanted to touch the move article ever due to so troublesome, Also again, this is really my careless mistaken. I should had just leave it alone and let you guys handle. Please forgive me, I swear now today I will never editing the move articles again. I promised you, never ever again. [[User:Singaporean|Singaporean]] ([[User talk:Singaporean|talk]]) 11:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
::You don't really have to avoid the move pages completely. Just don't add anything you can't prove is a given move (as outlined above). On the off chance that there's something like subtitles or commentary that you're taking at face value, you want to be very careful about relying on something you can't verify directly/personally. | |||
::Your mistake puts you at 1 strike. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 02:10, 30 October 2018 (UTC) | |||