User talk:Adamws: Difference between revisions

Line 49: Line 49:
:::::::Just because they're "new" areas, that doesn't mean they will ''always'' be "new" to people. Soon enough, people will know all they feel they need to know from Mirage Forests/etc, and if, at that point, they just want to find a given Pokemon, they shouldn't ''still'' be forced to visit the Mirage Forests/etc page just to figure out which location it is.
:::::::Just because they're "new" areas, that doesn't mean they will ''always'' be "new" to people. Soon enough, people will know all they feel they need to know from Mirage Forests/etc, and if, at that point, they just want to find a given Pokemon, they shouldn't ''still'' be forced to visit the Mirage Forests/etc page just to figure out which location it is.
:::::::People ''can'' remmeber names, but numbers are not—at all—"good" names. Especially when they're never overtly reinforced by the games. If the anime ever wants to do something, we can worry about it then; we don't need to complicate things with what may not be a problem. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 02:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
:::::::People ''can'' remmeber names, but numbers are not—at all—"good" names. Especially when they're never overtly reinforced by the games. If the anime ever wants to do something, we can worry about it then; we don't need to complicate things with what may not be a problem. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 02:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
::::::::They're certainly better names than "Mirage Mountain northeast of Route 125 but not too far north". What we got is what we got; using both is our best option. But that still leaves the question of what we're going to name the headers. Having just a line underneath that says " This is Mirage Cave 1" would look silly. Do we condense them, "Mirage Island 1 - East of Dewford"? <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 11:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
25,402

edits