Bulbapedia talk:Policy: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Admins) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
PsychicRider's comment violates the [[Bulbapedia:Code of Conduct|Code of Conduct]]. --[[User:Shiny Noctowl|<font color="black"><small>S</small><sup>h</sup><small>i</small><sub>n</sub><small>y</small> <sup>N</sup><small>o</small><sub>c</sub><small>t</small><sup>o</sup><small>w</small><sub>l</sub></font>]] 02:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | PsychicRider's comment violates the [[Bulbapedia:Code of Conduct|Code of Conduct]]. --[[User:Shiny Noctowl|<font color="black"><small>S</small><sup>h</sup><small>i</small><sub>n</sub><small>y</small> <sup>N</sup><small>o</small><sub>c</sub><small>t</small><sup>o</sup><small>w</small><sub>l</sub></font>]] 02:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
:If I may add my two cents. I'm not an admin or anything close, but I can understand that they do what they must to keep the 'pedia running smoothly. Quality-wise, everything is excellent here. I know I don't speak on Wikipedia's behalf, but I've heard that things there get messy and unorganized. The admins here just want to keep everything organized and running. If you have a question about one of their edits, I think it would be better to simply ask why instead of getting angry at them...they're nice people, I assure you. --<span style="color:#534F4B">The [[Special:Contributions/Snowrunt|ωild</span>]] [[User:Snowrunt|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''Snoωrunt'''</span>]] [[User talk:Snowrunt|<span style="color:#FF9900">'''fled!'''</span>]] 03:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:03, 21 July 2010
Can't it say here that users should not copy from Wikipedia? -- Pokeymonfan wuzn't here 02:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Admins
Why are admins here given practically unlimited control? Why isn't community consensus the driving factor behind decisions? Or is the thought process basically "Wikipedia is bad, therefore anything associated with or similar to Wikipedia is bad."? --Shiny Noctowl 02:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I don't know, maybe because community consensus actually requires... I don't know... a community?? Last time I checked, one person was definitely not one of those. ~ solaris 02:44, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- But this is how it's always been on Bulbapedia. Admins do whatever they want, and any users who object are blocked. --Shiny Noctowl 02:45, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
PsychicRider's comment violates the Code of Conduct. --Shiny Noctowl 02:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- If I may add my two cents. I'm not an admin or anything close, but I can understand that they do what they must to keep the 'pedia running smoothly. Quality-wise, everything is excellent here. I know I don't speak on Wikipedia's behalf, but I've heard that things there get messy and unorganized. The admins here just want to keep everything organized and running. If you have a question about one of their edits, I think it would be better to simply ask why instead of getting angry at them...they're nice people, I assure you. --The ωild Snoωrunt fled! 03:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
