252
edits
Talk:Trio master: Difference between revisions
→Removing the Legendary Golems
HoennMaster (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 421: | Line 421: | ||
:What more do you want me to do, go to each user's talk page and ask for their permission there? [[User:Golden Trainer|Golden Trainer]] ([[User talk:Golden Trainer|talk]]) 03:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC) | :What more do you want me to do, go to each user's talk page and ask for their permission there? [[User:Golden Trainer|Golden Trainer]] ([[User talk:Golden Trainer|talk]]) 03:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::Just because you have the most recent post, it doesn't mean no one disagrees with you. There are thousands of pages on the wiki, you aren't always going to get a response right away. As I already stated, there have already been objections to removing from the article. We don't know the full relationship with Regieleki and Regidrago yet and irregardless of it, the original relationship is still there and should be given it's own section on the page vs full removal. --[[User:HoennMaster|<font color="blue">Hoenn</font>]][[User talk:HoennMaster|<font color="green">Master</font>]] 06:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC) | :::Just because you have the most recent post, it doesn't mean no one disagrees with you. There are thousands of pages on the wiki, you aren't always going to get a response right away. As I already stated, there have already been objections to removing from the article. We don't know the full relationship with Regieleki and Regidrago yet and irregardless of it, the original relationship is still there and should be given it's own section on the page vs full removal. --[[User:HoennMaster|<font color="blue">Hoenn</font>]][[User talk:HoennMaster|<font color="green">Master</font>]] 06:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::Except that none of those comments addressed my point. I pointed out that the article doesn't work the way it is right now, as it contradicts itself. In the starting paragraph it says that a trio master is "a Pokémon that, in some way, oversees a Legendary trio of Pokémon", yet the article clearly treats the Legendary Titans as a quintet, having already added the new Regis to it, rather waiting until the expansion comes out. | |||
::::How much longer do you want me to wait for responses? If I bring up a problem with an article and offer a solution, then ''specifically ask people to speak up if they're against said solution'' and nobody says anything after a week, then I don't think I'm being unreasonable for taking their silence to mean that they have no issues with it. I can't read minds, the only way I can know if people have objections is if they post them. | |||
::::And if you read one of my previous comments, I don't really care whether the Regis are removed or not, ''as long as the article is corrected''. We don't need to wait for the expansion to come out in order to see how self-contradictory the article it. Either remove the new Regis for now, remove the group altogether, or move it to a separate section for former Trio Masters. Either solution works for me. We can update it again once the expansion comes out. [[User:Golden Trainer|Golden Trainer]] ([[User talk:Golden Trainer|talk]]) 07:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Master for every gen == | == Master for every gen == | ||
There is a master for every generation, albeit some later than others. They're stil a thing! Therefore It should not be deleted, but reformed better. [[User:Necrozma800|Necrozma800]] ([[User talk:Necrozma800|talk]]) 21:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | There is a master for every generation, albeit some later than others. They're stil a thing! Therefore It should not be deleted, but reformed better. [[User:Necrozma800|Necrozma800]] ([[User talk:Necrozma800|talk]]) 21:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | ||