252
edits
Talk:Trio master: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 423: | Line 423: | ||
::::Except that none of those comments addressed my point. I pointed out that the article doesn't work the way it is right now, as it contradicts itself. In the starting paragraph it says that a trio master is "a Pokémon that, in some way, oversees a Legendary trio of Pokémon", yet the article clearly treats the Legendary Titans as a quintet, having already added the new Regis to it, rather waiting until the expansion comes out. | ::::Except that none of those comments addressed my point. I pointed out that the article doesn't work the way it is right now, as it contradicts itself. In the starting paragraph it says that a trio master is "a Pokémon that, in some way, oversees a Legendary trio of Pokémon", yet the article clearly treats the Legendary Titans as a quintet, having already added the new Regis to it, rather waiting until the expansion comes out. | ||
::::How much longer do you want me to wait for responses? If I bring up a problem with an article and offer a solution, then ''specifically ask people to speak up if they're against said solution'' and nobody says anything after a week, then I don't think I'm being unreasonable for taking their silence to mean that they have no issues with it. I can't read minds, the only way I can know if people have objections is if they post them. | ::::How much longer do you want me to wait for responses? If I bring up a problem with an article and offer a solution, then ''specifically ask people to speak up if they're against said solution'' and nobody says anything after a week, then I don't think I'm being unreasonable for taking their silence to mean that they have no issues with it. I can't read minds, the only way I can know if people have objections is if they post them. | ||
::::And if you read one of my previous comments, I don't really care whether the Regis are removed or not, ''as long as the article is corrected''. We don't need to wait for the expansion to come out in order to see how self-contradictory the article | ::::And if you read one of my previous comments, I don't really care whether the Regis are removed or not, ''as long as the article is corrected''. We don't need to wait for the expansion to come out in order to see how self-contradictory the article is. Either remove the new Regis for now, remove the group altogether, or move it to a separate section for former Trio Masters. Either solution works for me. We can update it again once the expansion comes out. [[User:Golden Trainer|Golden Trainer]] ([[User talk:Golden Trainer|talk]]) 07:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
== Master for every gen == | == Master for every gen == | ||
There is a master for every generation, albeit some later than others. They're stil a thing! Therefore It should not be deleted, but reformed better. [[User:Necrozma800|Necrozma800]] ([[User talk:Necrozma800|talk]]) 21:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | There is a master for every generation, albeit some later than others. They're stil a thing! Therefore It should not be deleted, but reformed better. [[User:Necrozma800|Necrozma800]] ([[User talk:Necrozma800|talk]]) 21:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | ||