74,008
edits
User talk:Drapion: Difference between revisions
m
→Reviving Legends: new section
m (→Reviving Legends: new section) |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Please stop until further notice. I understand that you mean well, but it's a major batch of edits you're making, and I don't necessarily agree with the changes, so I've asked {{u|Shiningpikablu252}}'s opinion, as he's an admin. When he gets online, we'll see what he says. In the meantime, you can read the comment I made on his talk page to see what my deal is. :) --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 14:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | Please stop until further notice. I understand that you mean well, but it's a major batch of edits you're making, and I don't necessarily agree with the changes, so I've asked {{u|Shiningpikablu252}}'s opinion, as he's an admin. When he gets online, we'll see what he says. In the meantime, you can read the comment I made on his talk page to see what my deal is. :) --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 14:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Well, I checked out Shiningpikablu252's page and he doesn't seem to care either way. The reason I was doing it was that {{u|Moldy orange}} was making a bunch of pages (the ones I was seeing were around {{TCG|EX Ruby & Sapphire}}) with the "-30" and I think that we should be consistent. I realized that doing this might ruffle some feathers, so before I started I asked about it on the [[Bulbapedia talk:Project TCGDex#Resistance|Project TCG talk page]], and the only person who responded told me that the "-30"s were correct. I'll reiterate what I said there, "I really don't personally care which way this goes, but I would like some kind of consensus so that we can make it consistent."[[User:Drapion|Drapion]] 16:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | :Well, I checked out Shiningpikablu252's page and he doesn't seem to care either way. The reason I was doing it was that {{u|Moldy orange}} was making a bunch of pages (the ones I was seeing were around {{TCG|EX Ruby & Sapphire}}) with the "-30" and I think that we should be consistent. I realized that doing this might ruffle some feathers, so before I started I asked about it on the [[Bulbapedia talk:Project TCGDex#Resistance|Project TCG talk page]], and the only person who responded told me that the "-30"s were correct. I'll reiterate what I said there, "I really don't personally care which way this goes, but I would like some kind of consensus so that we can make it consistent."[[User:Drapion|Drapion]] 16:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Reviving Legends == | |||
It wasn't just you. The problem is that people keep adding things without an actual reliable source. First, someone added about the decks. Although I do think it is true, we can't put the information on the page because we don't know for sure it is. Secondly, we need the numbers in order to make the pages, and we don't like the surprisingly empty pages that resulted because of how little we currently know about the cards. There just is not enough information to make proper pages for the cards at this time. You weren't the only reason why I protected the page, I was just tired of people putting information on the page that PokéBeach claims to be true (and what Pokémon Sunday does as well). We would like to wait for confirmation from official sources, which should be happening relatively soon. Pokémon Card Laboratories updates their website with something every Friday morning at 6:00 UTC, and we will be waiting for confirmation from the official sources before we start confirming claims and making pages. Did you catch all that...do you understand why I would like to hold off until we know more about the cards? ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||