Talk:Attract (move): Difference between revisions

Talk:Attract (move) (view source)

Revision as of 06:41, 17 December 2009

214 bytes added , 17 December 2009

no edit summary

Frosslass

57

edits

Revision as of 02:17, 17 July 2009 (view source) Kenji-girl (talk \| contribs) (→‎Cutting the article's size.: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:41, 17 December 2009 (view source) Frosslass (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	How bout instead of listing nearly every single Pokémon, we say "All Pokémon that are capable of learning TMs and have genders, save for {{p\|Mew}}, can learn Attract by TM45"? Or something in that parameter at least. I just think listing all these Pokémon is unnecessary. --[[Tracey Sketchit\|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl\|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl\|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 02:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		How bout instead of listing nearly every single Pokémon, we say "All Pokémon that are capable of learning TMs and have genders, save for {{p\|Mew}}, can learn Attract by TM45"? Or something in that parameter at least. I just think listing all these Pokémon is unnecessary. --[[Tracey Sketchit\|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl\|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl\|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 02:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

			Lunatone can learn it? despite being genderless and unable to morph perhaps with brainwashing, anyway is this correct because it doesn't seem right to me [[User:Frosslass\|Frosslass]] 06:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)