Talk:Green (Adventures): Difference between revisions

Talk:Green (Adventures) (view source)

Revision as of 12:27, 18 September 2009

1,253 bytes removed , 18 September 2009

no edit summary

SuperLink

5

edits

@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 ::::::::Okay, the poll ''has'' been considered. But it will not be made until after the release of the Japanese Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver it'll give some time with some things. --[[User:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#40ad72;">'''☆Cool'''</span>]][[User talk:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#FFD733;">'''ピカチ'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#0098d8;">'''ュウ!'''</span>]] 01:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 :::::::::Fair enough. [[User:Zesty Cactus|Zesty Cactus]] 01:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
-::::I don't mean to kindle an old fire since this has gone for a little while without discussion, but I'll throw this in there anyway as I hadn't seen it mentioned. Why are you considering naming the articles on ''popularity'' in the first place? For what's supposed to be the most reliable Pokémon 'pedia around, shouldn't it always be using the most official English sources for its content? The whole notion that you should use Japanese names because they're more popular is ridiculous and couldn't reek any more of fanon, because half of the anime community still call Ash Satoshi Gary Shigeru and all that, it really shouldn't matter what people think. If it mattered what people think, why is the Gen IV Rival's game-name Pearl? I'm pretty sure next to noone calls him that compared to how popular names like Barry are. Yes, I understand a lot of pages would need fixed links and all that, but since when does "it's too hard/it'll take too long" come into making a reliable wiki? Also, apologies in advance if this discussion is more current elsewhere. I had a little look around but I'm pretty new - Even so I'm willing to help change the page names if need be once I know the ropes.--[[User:SuperLink|SuperLink]] 12:23, 18 September 2009 (UTC)