716
edits
Talk:List of Pokémon by New Pokédex number: Difference between revisions
Talk:List of Pokémon by New Pokédex number (view source)
Revision as of 19:57, 4 August 2009
, 4 August 2009→Lol at TTE: opinions
Tyler53841 (talk | contribs) |
(→Lol at TTE: opinions) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
::Not really, it's an improvement, the newdex was kind of lame, it was just 2 regions mashed up togehter. [[User:Max King|Max King]] 11:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | ::Not really, it's an improvement, the newdex was kind of lame, it was just 2 regions mashed up togehter. [[User:Max King|Max King]] 11:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Wouldn't be surprised if this update to the Johtodex numbers is to remove rare Generation 1 Pokémon like the starters or Legendaries especially if Nintendo were to try to block the pre-evolutions and evolutions of Pokémon that were introduced in Generation III and IV like they did with the FireRed and LeafGreen remakes. -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] 14:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | :::Wouldn't be surprised if this update to the Johtodex numbers is to remove rare Generation 1 Pokémon like the starters or Legendaries especially if Nintendo were to try to block the pre-evolutions and evolutions of Pokémon that were introduced in Generation III and IV like they did with the FireRed and LeafGreen remakes. -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] 14:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::I expect the same thing. I'm much more interested to see if they make a "Kanto" regional Pokedex that also has most/all of the Generation I and II Pokemon. Or, perhaps, in addition to a shortened Johto (and maybe Kanto) Pokedex, a ''New'' New Pokedex, that has every Pokemon reordered, ala the DPBP or the FireRed/LeafGreen habitat thing. [[User:DanPMK|MK]] 19:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC) | |||