Talk:Melodi: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
Why was the infobox removed? It made the page look much better, and gave the feeling that it had been given at least a little attention, rather than the slightly "thrown together" look of it's current revision. --[[User:Teradyne|Teradyne]] 19:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Why was the infobox removed? It made the page look much better, and gave the feeling that it had been given at least a little attention, rather than the slightly "thrown together" look of it's current revision. --[[User:Teradyne|Teradyne]] 19:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
:She's not... major enough. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 19:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
:She's not... major enough. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 19:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
::Maybe so, but I would think that admins and editors both would want to have, at the least, a small level of professionalism in Bulbapedia's articles. In it's current (18:34, 7 February 2009) version, this article looks like it was a piece of another article that someone ripped out and put on it's own page. In the previous (16:35, 7 February 2009) version, it looked much more complete, as if it were intended to be on it's own. It may seem stupid, but I honestly think that some people would be put off by how the article looks in it's current state. On the other hand, the same people would likely be much more impressed by the previous state that the article was in. --[[User:Teradyne|Teradyne]] 20:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
21

edits