5,080
edits
Talk:Pokémon LV.X (TCG): Difference between revisions
m
→Replacement: new section
m (→Replacement: new section) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:The TCG, I wouldn't say so. LV.X doesn't indicate a level over 100, it just indicates that the Pokémon is considerably stronger than the card from which it levelled-up (which ''does'' have a designated Level). It's like Pokémon-ex: designed to give the TCG a seriously powerful Pokémon variant. [[User:Cipher|<font style="color:#1874CD;">'''''Cipher'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Cipher|<sup style="color:#003F87;">'''''(Talk)'''''</sup>]] 17:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC) | :The TCG, I wouldn't say so. LV.X doesn't indicate a level over 100, it just indicates that the Pokémon is considerably stronger than the card from which it levelled-up (which ''does'' have a designated Level). It's like Pokémon-ex: designed to give the TCG a seriously powerful Pokémon variant. [[User:Cipher|<font style="color:#1874CD;">'''''Cipher'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Cipher|<sup style="color:#003F87;">'''''(Talk)'''''</sup>]] 17:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Replacement == | |||
I'd actually argue that the Pokémon LV.X mechanic is only a replacement for Pokémon-ex. Aside from the illustration leaving the box (which doesn't really count), they don't relate to Pokémon Star in any way. I'd argue that they were just phased out until alternate-coloration Pokémon returned in Stormfront. This is why I've removed the part about Pokémon Star being replaced, but if anyone disagrees, feel free to put it back or comment. [[User:Cipher|<font style="color:#1874CD;">'''''Cipher'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Cipher|<small style="color:#003F87;">'''''(Talk)'''''</small>]] 10:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | |||