User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 70708-100708: Difference between revisions

User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 70708-100708 (view source)

1,176 bytes added , 28 September 2008

→‎Re: Threat: stop ignoring what I say and respond with an actual point

624

edits

@@ Line 1,134: / Line 1,134: @@
 ::And the entire dispute was resolved a long time back.  The section doesn't belong.  --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 15:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
+:::I moved it back up because it was a continuation of the previous discussion.
+:::''The case in the Bone Rush attack on the Lucario in question is a very similar case to the attack on the Geodude in question.''
+::::Which, once again, doesn't matter if the Geodude in question was never involved in a similar dispute. I already responded to this with "just because it hasn't been done doesn't mean we shouldn't do it."
+:::''...average damages for each attack are not notable to be on the pages.''
+::::Which, once again, doesn't matter because notability isn't a specific condition of adding content to pages, only adding pages to the wiki. To say that it's "not notable enough to be on the page" assumes that there's a point at which things are notable enough to be on pages, and that's not part of the criteria for adding content to pages so the whole premise fails.
+:::''And the entire dispute was resolved a long time back.''
+::::You've said that already. I've challenged it already. You ignored my challenge and claim once again that it was "resolved" without, once again, showing me where it was resolved.
+:::--[[User:Raijinili|Raijinili]] 04:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)