222
edits
User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 70708-100708: Difference between revisions
User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 70708-100708 (view source)
Revision as of 02:16, 24 September 2008
, 24 September 2008→Deleting Template:IQ
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 1,083: | Line 1,083: | ||
:Well, then maybe you should have discussed your ideas with the sysops BEFORE you made any reversions and got into this edit war. Trying to force sysops to agree with you is not the way things get done around here, and such force will probably make such sysops less likely to agree with you. Honestly, if something I did was reverted for being a bad idea, I'd consult with people before re-implementing that idea, in case it turns out it really was a bad idea. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 02:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC) | :Well, then maybe you should have discussed your ideas with the sysops BEFORE you made any reversions and got into this edit war. Trying to force sysops to agree with you is not the way things get done around here, and such force will probably make such sysops less likely to agree with you. Honestly, if something I did was reverted for being a bad idea, I'd consult with people before re-implementing that idea, in case it turns out it really was a bad idea. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 02:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Oh, so Bulbapedia is not, in fact, a wiki, and that every edit that I make have to go through some "approval process" before making it into these hallowed pages. That's a load of bunk. Again, I contend all three of you are acting in bad faith. Honestly, I probably won't contribute here until I get a full written apology, and believe me there are still lots of faults with how it is now. That's how much of a disincentive you are making it to edit here. [[User:KelvSYC|KelvSYC]] 02:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC) | |||