16,425
edits
Talk:Manaphy (M09): Difference between revisions
→Gender
(→Gender) |
Fabu-Vinny (talk | contribs) (→Gender) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
I don't think Manaphy's gender should be "none" since it's unknown if genderless Pokemon apply in the anime, and therefore, not 100% confirmed. In fact i think it's very unlikely that it's genderless since there was a female (mother) Lugia in the series, so it should be "Unknown" ([[User:GT4GTR|GT4GTR]] 11:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)) | I don't think Manaphy's gender should be "none" since it's unknown if genderless Pokemon apply in the anime, and therefore, not 100% confirmed. In fact i think it's very unlikely that it's genderless since there was a female (mother) Lugia in the series, so it should be "Unknown" ([[User:GT4GTR|GT4GTR]] 11:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)) | ||
:I agree with your statement, But I think it should be listed as a Male. I don't think they would call a female Manaphy a "Prince of the Sea", since a Prince is the male half of a monarch to be. The mere fact that it was referred to as the Prince of the Sea in both Coro Coro AND the film itself has stable grounds for it to be listed as a Male. [[User:Weedle Mchairybug|Weedle Mchairybug]] 16:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | :I agree with your statement, But I think it should be listed as a Male. I don't think they would call a female Manaphy a "Prince of the Sea", since a Prince is the male half of a monarch to be. The mere fact that it was referred to as the Prince of the Sea in both Coro Coro AND the film itself has stable grounds for it to be listed as a Male. [[User:Weedle Mchairybug|Weedle Mchairybug]] 16:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Not necessarily. The episode that aired immediately before movie 9 was about Aipom becoming a king, even though the very same episode confirmed its gender as female. --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>|[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|Talk Page]]|</sup> 17:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | |||