Talk:Catch rate: Difference between revisions

Talk:Catch rate (view source)

306 bytes added , 24 June 2008

16,425

edits

Revision as of 18:51, 24 June 2008 (view source) Origamiguy (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Trivia...) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:54, 24 June 2008 (view source) Fabu-Vinny (talk \| contribs) (→‎Trivia...) Newer edit →
Line 102:		Line 102:

	::remove it because it makes no sense? i had thought dialga had a low catch rate when i got the game, and it turns out to be 30, quite high for a legendary... <small>'''<span style="border:2px solid #000000; font-family:Verdana;">{{Colored link\|:User:Origamiguy\|ff8000\|Lord}} of {{Colored link\|:User_talk:Origamiguy\|ff8000\|Ori}}{{Colored link\|Special:Contributions/Origamiguy\|ff8000\|gami}}</span>'''</small> 18:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		::remove it because it makes no sense? i had thought dialga had a low catch rate when i got the game, and it turns out to be 30, quite high for a legendary... <small>'''<span style="border:2px solid #000000; font-family:Verdana;">{{Colored link\|:User:Origamiguy\|ff8000\|Lord}} of {{Colored link\|:User_talk:Origamiguy\|ff8000\|Ori}}{{Colored link\|Special:Contributions/Origamiguy\|ff8000\|gami}}</span>'''</small> 18:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
			:::I know what it's saying: They look like the kind of Pokémon that would have a lower catch rate than they actually do. That's still based on the player's conjecture and probably not worth noting. --[[User:Fabu-Vinny\|FabuVinny]] <sup>\|[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny\|Talk Page]]\|</sup> 18:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)