935
edits
Talk:Pecharunt (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Are these statements actually a stretch or not? I think we should have discussed this before removing these.
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:So, to summarize, the only trivia point noted here that I think is reasonable to add is the fact that all its level-up moves are learned at multiples of eight. I also think the points about Malignant Chain having a maximum PP of eight and Pecharunt taking neutral damage from eight types, which are currently on the page, should be removed. [[User:Storm Aurora|'''<span style="background:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,#9CB8C6,#625A88);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent;">Storm Aurora</span>''']] ([[User talk:Storm Aurora|talk]]) 05:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | :So, to summarize, the only trivia point noted here that I think is reasonable to add is the fact that all its level-up moves are learned at multiples of eight. I also think the points about Malignant Chain having a maximum PP of eight and Pecharunt taking neutral damage from eight types, which are currently on the page, should be removed. [[User:Storm Aurora|'''<span style="background:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,#9CB8C6,#625A88);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent;">Storm Aurora</span>''']] ([[User talk:Storm Aurora|talk]]) 05:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Seconding Storm's points. [[User:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#00d1bc">'''Land'''</span>]][[User talk:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#006699"><small>'''fish7'''</small></span>]] 06:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | ::Seconding Storm's points. [[User:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#00d1bc">'''Land'''</span>]][[User talk:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#006699"><small>'''fish7'''</small></span>]] 06:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: I see, however I do feel that for it’s base stats, it should still be mentioned how 160 is a multiple of 8 as they clearly still wanted it to fit into the theme of 8, just in a different way and since nothing about it’s stats is a stretch, that’s why I argue that the fact 160 is a multiple of 8 should be included here. | |||
[[User:TurtwigFan4848|TurtwigFan4848]][[User:TurtwigFan4848|TurtwigFan4848]] ([[User talk:TurtwigFan4848|talk]]) 18:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | |||