2
edits
(→Outdated info: new section) |
|||
Line 674: | Line 674: | ||
This stands in stark contrast to everything I've seen from the fandom across several different websites, conventions, and gaming journalism websites. I can not think of a gen that has a worse reputation within the community. I would like to see some sources that support this claim, or for a change to be made to the article. I understand that it's considered to have one of the best stories in the franchise, but that's only a piece of the big picture and to me this statement appears to be abject fallacy. [[User:Darkmage|Darkmage]] ([[User talk:Darkmage|talk]]) 05:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC) | This stands in stark contrast to everything I've seen from the fandom across several different websites, conventions, and gaming journalism websites. I can not think of a gen that has a worse reputation within the community. I would like to see some sources that support this claim, or for a change to be made to the article. I understand that it's considered to have one of the best stories in the franchise, but that's only a piece of the big picture and to me this statement appears to be abject fallacy. [[User:Darkmage|Darkmage]] ([[User talk:Darkmage|talk]]) 05:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
== Outdated info == | |||
Ranked underneath Trivia -> Generation V is the only generation in which, it states the following: | |||
A single-type Pokémon of every type is introduced. | |||
This, however, is no longer true as there is no pure fairy type in Generation V. Only Cottonee and Whimsicott are Fairy type, but both are dual-typed. [[User:OzorianTrainer|OzorianTrainer]] ([[User talk:OzorianTrainer|talk]]) 12:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) |
edits