Talk:Generation V: Difference between revisions

Talk:Generation V (view source)

Revision as of 05:44, 8 September 2019

87 bytes added , 8 September 2019

→‎"considered one of the best gens"

Darkmage

5

edits

Revision as of 05:44, 8 September 2019 (view source) Darkmage (talk \| contribs) (→‎"considered one of the best gens": new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:44, 8 September 2019 (view source) Darkmage (talk \| contribs) (→‎"considered one of the best gens") Newer edit →
Line 673:		Line 673:
	"After a while, Generation V came to be considered one of the best Pokémon generations at the time"		"After a while, Generation V came to be considered one of the best Pokémon generations at the time"

	This stands in stark contrast to everything I've seen from the fandom across several different websites, conventions, and gaming journalism websites. I can not think of a gen that has a worse reputation within the community. I would like to see some sources that support this claim, or for a change to be made to the article. I understand that it's considered to have one of the best stories in the franchise, but that's only a piece of the big picture and to me this statement appears to be abject fallacy.		This stands in stark contrast to everything I've seen from the fandom across several different websites, conventions, and gaming journalism websites. I can not think of a gen that has a worse reputation within the community. I would like to see some sources that support this claim, or for a change to be made to the article. I understand that it's considered to have one of the best stories in the franchise, but that's only a piece of the big picture and to me this statement appears to be abject fallacy. [[User:Darkmage\|Darkmage]] ([[User talk:Darkmage\|talk]]) 05:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)