Talk:Mewtwo (M01): Difference between revisions

(Undo revision 3425702 by Horn (talk)again don’t respond to comments over 6 months old)
Tag: Undo
Line 375: Line 375:


You see, with Mew, no one claim the one from Journeys is the same Mew as the one appearing in M01 just because they both are voiced by Yamadera. So, why should we claim the same about Mewtwo? Yes, it was voiced by Masachika Ichimura, but that is the only connection it has with this Mewtwo. On the other hand, my doubt is supported by the fact that while in JN046 Ash recognizes Mewtwo, Mewtwo doesn't seem to have the same recognition of Ash it had in Mewtwo Returns. So, that prompted me to doubt the two Mewtwo are the same. --[[User:Horn|Horn]] ([[User talk:Horn|talk]]) 16:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
You see, with Mew, no one claim the one from Journeys is the same Mew as the one appearing in M01 just because they both are voiced by Yamadera. So, why should we claim the same about Mewtwo? Yes, it was voiced by Masachika Ichimura, but that is the only connection it has with this Mewtwo. On the other hand, my doubt is supported by the fact that while in JN046 Ash recognizes Mewtwo, Mewtwo doesn't seem to have the same recognition of Ash it had in Mewtwo Returns. So, that prompted me to doubt the two Mewtwo are the same. --[[User:Horn|Horn]] ([[User talk:Horn|talk]]) 16:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
== Is JN046 Mewtwo really this one? Part 2 ==
Due to some stupid rule I have to start new topic instead of continue with my old one, which will only mess this talk page, but whatever, rule is rule.<br>In the past 10 months, no one bothered to show me any proof that JN046 Mewtwo and M01 Mewtwo really are one and the same. May we then consider that part as speculation and assumption that should have no place here and remove that part of this article? Or there is proof for this assumption I am not aware? If so, shouldn't it be quated in the article?
23

edits