Category talk:Moves: Difference between revisions

(Don't put a new subject in the middle of the page...)
Line 22: Line 22:
Also, Sorry for not linking, I'm new here and I don't quite know how.[[User:The Hidden Ninja|The Hidden Ninja]] ([[User talk:The Hidden Ninja|talk]]) 17:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Also, Sorry for not linking, I'm new here and I don't quite know how.[[User:The Hidden Ninja|The Hidden Ninja]] ([[User talk:The Hidden Ninja|talk]]) 17:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
:We already have "by a prior evolution" on species pages. For the move pages, the pre-evolutions are already on the page, so it's not strictly necessary to, for example, make a special section on {{m|Hypnosis}} where you can put "Gallade" just so you can explicitly see that, when you can already just find Ralts/Kirlia. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 19:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
:We already have "by a prior evolution" on species pages. For the move pages, the pre-evolutions are already on the page, so it's not strictly necessary to, for example, make a special section on {{m|Hypnosis}} where you can put "Gallade" just so you can explicitly see that, when you can already just find Ralts/Kirlia. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 19:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
== Move pages and categorization with TM/TR and Move Tutors ==
Hello, not sure if this is the right place to post this. I'd like to propose to a general standard for Move pages: to merge "by TM/TR" with "by Move Tutor" category. This is because many Move Tutoring moves from Gens III, IV and V were TMs also previously (in the specific case on Gen III, all the Move Tutors were TMs in Gen II), and since the TM and Move Tutor sections respectively already allow comparison of the learnability throughout generations, it could help to make this comparison. It just seems logical to me. [[User:JoeCareer|JoeCareer]] ([[User talk:JoeCareer|talk]]) 18:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
7

edits