40,980
edits
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 11: Difference between revisions
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 11 (view source)
Revision as of 04:54, 20 December 2020
, 20 December 2020→Finally offering up a reply ....
(→Finally offering up a reply ....: new section) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1,812: | Line 1,812: | ||
You are great when I need someone to review a new page, ask about finding something and policy in general. However, there have been issues I've brought to your attention in the past and yet it wasn't addressed properly, and the issue was prolonged because no one intervened, fully aware of the conduct that was happening and how wrong it was. [[User:PardescanSlowbro|PardescanSlowbro]] ([[User talk:PardescanSlowbro|talk]]) 21:17, 19 December 2020 (UTC) | You are great when I need someone to review a new page, ask about finding something and policy in general. However, there have been issues I've brought to your attention in the past and yet it wasn't addressed properly, and the issue was prolonged because no one intervened, fully aware of the conduct that was happening and how wrong it was. [[User:PardescanSlowbro|PardescanSlowbro]] ([[User talk:PardescanSlowbro|talk]]) 21:17, 19 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
:I had already explained clearly why your suggestions aren't good ones, and I have tried to summarize it in one sentence, yet you still have a hard time uderstanding it. For Cyrstal Onix, I had already explained it clearly. It is '''not''' a recurring character, so it does '''not''' fall under the recurring character rule. It falls under the '''Pokemon of the day rule''' because that's what it is and that's why it's notable. Not that hard to understand. | |||
:As for Benny, again, I've already explained clearly why that is not how we do things. The Pokemon only gets the larger box ''if there is no article on the Pokemon and there is no where the information can go''. Wobbuffet and Lickitung ''have'' articles, so that do '''not''' need the larger boxes. That should be very clear with how we do things. As for the wording, again, there is ''no'' consistency issues. Not every character article needs to be worded the same. Not that hard to understand. | |||
:"To feel resolved about it" is exactly what I meant by "trying to get the answer you want". And you do this any time someone objects your suggestions, you just go to the next user in the hopes that you get what you want. You need to learn to let things go when your ideas get rejected by a majority of users (not just me).--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#00A1E9">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#59C2F1">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#BF004F">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D5598C">ire</span>]] 04:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC) | |||