User talk:SnorlaxMonster: Difference between revisions

Line 677: Line 677:


Now that all the information from those articles has been transcribed to each item's own page, should we reduce those articles to categories? If we want to keep them as articles, then I think we should at least change "Template:Item" to link to the item's main article. [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]]) 04:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Now that all the information from those articles has been transcribed to each item's own page, should we reduce those articles to categories? If we want to keep them as articles, then I think we should at least change "Template:Item" to link to the item's main article. [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]]) 04:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
:They already do link to the item main articles, although perhaps it would be better to have the link in the item's name rather than the lower right. As for what to do with them, some of them are worth keeping IMO ([[herbal medicine]]), but others (like [[In-battle effect item]]) are worth reviewing; however, I'd rather we deal with them once we have split all of the items. We still have a lot of items to split. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 06:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)